The decision to punish a drunk driving lawyer was madeThe ruling on the punishment of drunk driving lawyers argued that in order to operate in the rule of law, they will live in cooperation with others by following the prescribed livelihood patterns and norms.He remonstrated that considerable legal punishment was decided for safety protection behavior, and domestic violence was not recognized for any reason.He mentioned that if his spouse is injured to satisfy his purpose, he can see the cruel reality.Not only is the intensity of the investigation getting stricter, but it is also complicated for the suspect to make a proper prima facie showing of his position, so some lawyers specializing in drunk driving remonstrated that they should not prove the charges.Lawyers emphasized that cheating should not start no matter what the situation, and they desperately needed the help of agents such as drunk driving lawyers.In the fact that it has already been accused, a lawyer specializing in drunk driving said that if the emphasis is reversed, it should be recognized that it is difficult to finish the case.ㅍ, who lived in the hotel, claimed that repeated incidents with O, a prostitute, actually existed.He claimed that he only provided funds at the accommodation and had a bed together, but Mr. O was forced to drink He remonstrated that even forced sexual intercourse occurred in the reality of being drunk.Mr. ㅍ claimed that he couldn’t refuse, but said that ㅍ threatened him by revealing that he was a customer, and argued that he tried to make such an extreme choice and ended up with an attempt.He expressed his remorse with the idea that his actions were wrong, but Mr. O, who had given up all of them, claimed that Mr. O, who suffered serious damage, visited her family and the doctor and hospitalized her.It was reported that the investigation was conducted according to the report of acquaintances, and that the investigator in charge and the other party were among the family members.The victim’s family and anger were so great that they arrested him immediately, but the investigative agency punished ㅍ for not sending him because the evidence was not clear.The drunk driving lawyer pointed out the reality that the investigation left too many psychological scars on Mr. O, and applied based on data that ㅍ even requested to destroy evidence during the investigation process.He argued that it was too much to collect evidence because it happened in a place where there was no one on the front page, and said that even if he was in trouble, he should apply to the investigative agency for the collected facts and prove his innocence.A lawyer specializing in drunk driving said that the case ended with a winning ruling after requesting a civil suit related to psychological damage compensation and receiving a compensation ruling.Let’s list the issues that were sorted out with the advice of a drunk driving lawyer, and the customer ㅇ and ㅎ employees claimed that conflicts of opinion continued to occur and a bad atmosphere occurred between them.He said that this crime was an incident in which employee w reported employee ㅇ.ㅎThe staff accused the other room of cheating.In order to explain this, he mentioned that he had secured a number of factual data based on interests, and that he repeatedly changed unfavorable statements and referred to his innocence while responding to his colleagues’ pleas.I mentioned that the incident started in the back of the store room and that it was hard for the customer and H, who emphasized the witness, to agree with each other.He mentioned that it is difficult to apply for evidence and get an ideal conclusion, and that in order to solve the question, you should receive evidence with a drunk driving lawyer.When involved in a difficult task to deal with, it was necessary to borrow a professional helper with Morahan’s background and strategy for defense.He reiterated that if convicted, he would be sentenced to more than three years in prison and would not end in prison, but would be appropriate to prepare for the allegations as sufficient disadvantages such as personal information registration punishment, background notification order, job hunting restrictions, and electronic ankles can be added.So far, he has confirmed conflicts and internal conflicts between his colleagues and mentioned that hostile interests exist, but there has been no situation where violence has erupted.In addition, he claimed that the charges continued because of the bad feelings of the defendants, Mr. H and Mr. O, and that it was practically possible to request no charges.He argued that it is wise to prepare before arrest occurs because he should be charged with a crime that is much larger than his own actions or if he cannot defend his reasons for defense carefully.He urged them to seek legal countermeasures, keep their pessimistic statements silent, refute their positions, and ask for help to increase credibility if they become suspects in Burma.He argued that adultery was an unacceptable act for any reason.If you face the reality of the other party’s criminal charges, they argued that appropriate measures should be taken, such as quickly investigating the shooting relationship and preparing evidence for unfair practices.Previous image Next imagePrevious image Next imagePrevious image Next image
